BowTie Analysis for Hazardous Facilities

Last updated: February 9, 2026

Overview

BowTie Analysis is a structured Major Accident Hazard (MAH) management technique used to identify, assess, and control high-consequence risks within tolerable limits. It visually links hazards, credible threats, preventive barriers, mitigative measures, and consequences, providing a clear and auditable framework for BowTie risk assessment in complex oil & gas and energy facilities.

This approach supports effective ALARP demonstration, improves risk visibility, and ensures safety-critical risks are managed throughout the asset lifecycle.

Methodology

The BowTie Analysis methodology is applied during the engineering phase and integrated with upstream safety studies such as HAZID and HAZOP. The study followed a structured and workshop-based approach:

  • Identification of MAH scenarios for process and construction activities
  • Definition of hazards, top events, credible threats, and worst-case consequences
  • Development of detailed BowTie diagrams using specialist BowTie software
  • Identification and categorisation of preventive and mitigative barriers
  • Evaluation of barrier effectiveness, independence, and criticality
  • Identification of Safety Critical Elements (SCEs) and Safety Critical Tasks (SCTs)
  • Assessment of escalation factors and escalation controls
  • Qualitative ALARP demonstration through barrier adequacy verification
  • Multidisciplinary BowTie workshops involving engineering, operations, maintenance, and HSE teams
A BowTie risk assessment diagram showing the flow from HAZID and HAZOP to hazard and top event identification. The central BowTie diagram maps multiple "Threats" on the left with "Preventive Barriers" leading to a central event (depicted with a flame icon). On the right side, it shows resulting "Consequences" with blocked paths indicating protective actions. The diagram continues downward with "Escalation Factors", followed by steps to "Assess & Implement Controls" and "Establish & Maintain Safeguards".
BowTie Risk Assessment – A visual method for identifying hazards, threats, and consequences, with barriers and controls to manage risks in process safety.

Outcomes

The BowTie Analysis delivered measurable improvements in MAH risk management, including:

  • Clear visualisation of major accident risk pathways
  • Improved understanding of hazard escalation during construction and operations
  • Identification of safety-critical equipment and safety-critical human actions
  • Strengthened design, construction, and operational controls
  • Practical recommendations to improve system reliability
  • A structured basis for ongoing barrier management across the asset lifecycle

BowTie Analysis for Gas System Modification – QatarEnergy (FEED Stage)

Introduction

A BowTie Analysis was performed for QatarEnergy during the Front-End Engineering Design (FEED) stage of a gas system modification project covering multiple gas distribution stations and downstream power plant interfaces across Qatar, including Ras Laffan Industrial City, Mesaieed Industrial City, Al Wakrah, and Ras Abu Fontas.

The study addressed Major Accident Hazards (MAHs) associated with modifications to live operating gas facilities, where uninterrupted gas supply to critical power generation assets and personnel safety were key requirements. The analysis considered risks arising from construction activities, pipeline tie-ins, station bypass installations, and temporary operating conditions.

The BowTie methodology was applied as part of a broader HSE risk management framework, ensuring that MAH controls and associated preventive and mitigative safety barriers were systematically identified and embedded into design development, and operational philosophy, in line with QatarEnergy corporate safety standards.

Project Insights

Loss of containment of fuel gas was identified as the primary top event across all credible Major Accident Hazard (MAH) scenarios. The BowTie Analysis evaluated hazards associated with live system modifications, including:

  • Construction activities
  • Hot tapping and pipeline tie-ins
  • Pipeline reconfiguration
  • Pressure control changes
  • Temporary operating conditions

Credible threats contributing to these scenarios included:

  • Mechanical damage during construction
  • Over-pressurisation
  • Isolation and valve failures
  • Corrosion and degradation mechanisms
  • Dropped objects
  • Vehicle movements and lifting operations

Preventive safety barriers were systematically reviewed to confirm adequacy and effectiveness, including:

  • Design verification and compliance with engineering standards
  • Permit-to-work and isolation management systems
  • Contractor competency, training, and authorization controls
  • Inspection, testing, and maintenance regimes

Mitigative safety barriers were assessed to limit consequences in the event of a loss of containment, including:

  • Gas detection and alarm systems
  • Emergency Shutdown (ESD) functions
  • Pressure protection systems
  • Fire and gas detection and suppression systems
  • Emergency response arrangements

Escalation factors that could degrade barrier performance during construction and temporary operations were identified, leading to targeted improvements in:

  • Work sequencing and planning
  • Supervision and real-time monitoring
  • Asset integrity management

A qualitative ALARP demonstration confirmed that risks associated with the modifications can be reduced to tolerable levels through appropriate engineering and operational measures.

Conclusion

The BowTie Analysis provided QatarEnergy with a clear and defensible HSI framework for managing Major Accident Hazards during gas system modifications at the FEED stage.

By defining hazards, safety-critical barriers, and escalation controls, the study supported safer execution of live system works while reducing reliance on procedural controls alone.

The outcome enhanced confidence in maintaining uninterrupted gas supply, improved visibility of safety-critical elements and tasks, and embedded MAH management into design decision-making supporting safe project delivery and long-term operational resilience.

Several workers wearing safety helmets and orange vests are engaged in maintenance work on a pipeline system. A crane is lifting a large pipe section while others weld and inspect equipment. Safety cones, caution tape, fire extinguishers, and scaffolding are present, indicating an active construction zone.
Pipeline Maintenance as a Preventive Control – Field implementation of safety measures to manage operational risks.

Looking for BowTie Analysis support for gas system modifications?
Explore our BowTie Analysis services

Looking for BowTie Analysis services?

iFluids Engineering delivers FEED-stage BowTie studies to identify safety critical barriers and support ALARP demonstration for live operating facilities.

Contact us to support your next high risk project with expert BowTie analysis and practical risk reduction.

Frequently Asked Questions

BowTie Analysis is a risk assessment method used to identify hazards, threats, consequences, and the preventive and mitigative barriers required to control major accident risks.

BowTie Analysis is typically performed during FEED, detailed engineering, construction planning, and for modifications to live operating facilities.

It helps verify that safety barriers are adequate, effective, and independent, ensuring risks are reduced to tolerable levels.

HAZOP and HAZID identify hazards, while BowTie focuses on managing safety barriers and controlling the escalation of risks.

Yes. BowTie Analysis provides a structured basis for demonstrating that risks have been reduced As Low As Reasonably Practicable.